What Mark Carney鈥檚 victory means for聽the mining industry

Mark Carney’s extremely tight victory in Canada’s federal election is poised to significantly impact the mining industry, particularly the extraction and processing of critical minerals essential for the global energy transition.
Fast-tracking approvals
Carney’s administration plans to establish a “Major Federal Project Office” with a “one project, one review” mandate. This initiative aims to streamline environmental assessments by eliminating duplication between federal and provincial processes, thereby accelerating the approval of mining projects. Such a move is poised to benefit companies involved in critical mineral extraction, including lithium, nickel, and cobalt, by reducing bureaucratic delays.
Carney has not provided clarity on how the consent process would be expedited to meet the timeline pressures of energy and infrastructure development. This ambiguity is notable, particularly as his promise to avoid forcing projects through appears to contradict his assurances that major projects will proceed swiftly. Past provincial experiences, such as B.C.’s attempts to expedite development under similar consent commitments, suggest that balancing these priorities is fraught with legal and political difficulty.
Carney鈥檚 approach implies an acknowledgment of a de facto Indigenous veto over resource projects鈥攂ut rather than confronting this head-on, he proposes to 鈥渂uy in鈥 Indigenous participation through public financing mechanisms. This creates a practical route around a hard veto by offering Indigenous communities ownership stakes that align their interests with project success.
Reconciling the urgency of certain projects with the potentially time-consuming process of obtaining consent from multiple Indigenous nations will prove tricky. It begs the question of whether or not this model serves the public interest.
On one hand, it represents a constructive shift from conflict to partnership, promoting reconciliation and potentially leading to more stable and inclusive development. It avoids the legal and ethical risks associated with imposing projects on unwilling nations. On the other hand, it raises questions about the use of taxpayer-backed funds as a means of securing project approval. There is a risk that such financing becomes a permanent cost of doing business, even for projects that may not deliver strong returns to the public.
Whether this is sustainable or fair depends on how transparent and equitable the resulting arrangements are 鈥 and whether public funds are being used to create true partnerships or merely to neutralize opposition.
Investment in critical minerals
The Carney-led government plans to invest in the development of critical minerals by:
- Connecting critical mineral projects to supply chains , enhancing integration within the Canadian economy;
- Supporting clean energy and critical minerals projects through the FLMF to reduce reliance on other countries and protect Canadian jobs;
- Accelerating exploration and extraction, including from recycling, by investing in prospecting activities and
- Attracting and de-risking investment in critical mineral exploration and extraction through additional investments and expanded tax credits.
US tariffs
In response to US President Donald Trump’s imposition of tariffs on Canadian imports, Carney has pledged a firm stance. His administration plans to invest billions to reduce Canada’s economic dependence on the southern neighbour, including a $2 billion strategic response fund to protect Canadian workers and fortify the auto supply chain.
This shift towards trade diversification and economic resilience is likely to open new markets for Canadian mining exports, particularly in Asia and Europe, thereby reducing vulnerability to US trade policies.
Energy superpower
Mark Carney鈥檚 campaign message on energy, echoing Stephen Harper鈥檚 , signals a sweeping ambition 鈥 but with a broader, more climate-conscious twist. In his election night speech, Carney declared it was 鈥渢ime to build Canada into an energy superpower in both clean and conventional energy鈥 and pushed for an industrial strategy that boosts competitiveness while addressing climate change.
Now leading a Liberal government, Carney faces the challenge of balancing economic growth with environmental responsibility. His platform includes designed to fast-track approvals for infrastructure such as pipelines and transmission lines. He has also pledged to streamline regulatory processes to reduce delays that have long hindered energy and resource development.
Carney supports carbon capture and storage technology, a key strategy for the oil and gas sector to reduce emissions. His promise of federal backing extends to major infrastructure and extraction efforts, notably the Ring of Fire in northern Ontario. The region is rich in critical minerals essential for electric vehicles, batteries and other technologies vital to a low-carbon economy.
Some First Nations groups with claims in the area oppose development, which could take a decade to implement judging by other projects. Environmentalists say it will release the same global warming gases from the region鈥檚 muskeg that the electric-battery vehicle metals it would produce are supposed to limit.
Canada’s elected Prime Minister has also committed to advancing transportation and energy projects in the Arctic, paired with a planned expansion of the country’s military presence in the region.
Environmental commitments
While promoting mining development, Carney’s administration also maintains environmental commitments, such as upholding the industrial carbon tax and imposing caps on oil and gas emissions. This approach aims to ensure that mining growth aligns with Canada’s climate goals.
Despite facing challenges such as taxation, immigration and political influences, including Trump’s rhetoric, Canada’s natural resource development was a common topic brought up by the two main political parties.
Carney’s recent victory signals a proactive approach to strengthening Canada鈥檚 mining industry, a significant contributor to the country鈥檚 economy. The sector accounted for nearly 20% of the country鈥檚 gross domestic product in 2022, alongside C$422 billion ($305 billion) in exports.
{{ commodity.name }}
{{ post.title }}
{{ post.date }}
7 Comments
Ronald
It sounds very good, but I will believe it when I see it thank you
Peter Best
No mention in this column of the elephant in the room- the Indigenous de facto veto over resource projects. And no discussion of whether it is in the public interest that this veto has to be bought off with taxpayer-backed money for any project to proceed.. thereisnodifference.ca
Cecilia Jamasmie
An earlier version of this article did not include Carney’s views on the role of Canada’s First Nations in the approval of mining and energy projects. We have since expanded on that point. Thank you for bringing this issue to our attention.
Sharif Rezowan
I鈥檓 pretty excited. Great to have Mark Carney as PM who understands the importance of critical minerals.
Couple of Canadian stocks who got grants from US DoD and Canada will be awesome to invest in. I really hope, the companies and Fed will work together to fast track the permit process. Good luck Fortune Mineral (FT.TO), Lomiko Metals (LMR.V) !
David H Murray
Certainly a welcome idea to combat the USA tariff issue. My concern though, is governance over the polution and wilderness devastation unless there is a watchdog on the wilderness.
Harry Sole
Actually nothing will happen with the liberal in power!
Anne
Carney will destroy our economy the way he destroyed the UK’s by forbidding any non- green investment in Canada. The same old crap Trudeau did. All the Liberals did was change the head of the snake. Having the caps remain on OUR oil & gas will cripple Canada. Why do you think so many countries are pulling away from green energy, because it kills economies since it is so expensive to do. Carney wants to inflict this on us.
Remember when Japan came to Canada to request to buy our natural gas which in turn would bring in millions into our economy Trudeau told Japan there’s no business in producing natural gas so no you cannot have it, so instead Japan went to the states & made a deal with them. That’s what our future looks like under Carney & the Liberals.
Life will not get easier or less expensive just the opposite.
Thanks for nothing liberal lovers.